11-09-2010, 01:41 PM
I wasn't calling anyone out in particular - anyone who claims they haven't knowingly ripped someone off in Mogul is lying - we've all done it.
My issue is just that we have it knowingly out there that we're scrutinizing the planning of new GMs much tighter than we would established GMs, so that in a situation like yours Irish, you'd know that it could be a possibility prior to trading. What I want to avoid is the "oh shit!" followed by a rant about how unfair vetos are and blah blah blah. I certainly don't want to boy in the bubble anyone...but guys have to do better than "sure, why the hell not" if they just walked in the door and the deal isn't great.
My issue is just that we have it knowingly out there that we're scrutinizing the planning of new GMs much tighter than we would established GMs, so that in a situation like yours Irish, you'd know that it could be a possibility prior to trading. What I want to avoid is the "oh shit!" followed by a rant about how unfair vetos are and blah blah blah. I certainly don't want to boy in the bubble anyone...but guys have to do better than "sure, why the hell not" if they just walked in the door and the deal isn't great.