• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
SFG/LAA
#6
(11-08-2010, 01:38 AM)raysman1 Wrote: Accept.

Veto for the fact that LAA did not post reasoning which is necessary for any trade to be subject to being approved.

And for DJ's concern for this trade, LAA is not giving up too much except a mid level spec, SF is paying for most of the NTC. LAA is getting more out of the deal currently, but obviously Sandoval's declining vitals and his long term contract is the reason for your concern and the reason why scotty has been trying to move this guy.

Again I want reasoning from LAA before I accept this, but I am assuming it would be something like "I want him so we can win now, even if his contract might be burden in the future."

[Image: PittsburghPirates.jpg] GM  2010-2017:  572-724  .441 W%
        Best Year: 2015: 86-76 (3rd NL Cent)
Yankees GM: 2019-2022ish
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Messages In This Thread
SFG/LAA - by Scott - 11-08-2010, 01:36 AM
RE: SFG/LAA - by raysman1 - 11-08-2010, 01:38 AM
RE: SFG/LAA - by AndyP - 11-08-2010, 02:05 AM
RE: SFG/LAA - by terrythek - 11-08-2010, 06:22 AM
RE: SFG/LAA - by dejota - 11-08-2010, 12:09 PM
RE: SFG/LAA - by Jordan - 11-08-2010, 02:49 PM
RE: SFG/LAA - by chrisveley - 11-08-2010, 03:08 PM
RE: SFG/LAA - by dejota - 11-08-2010, 03:40 PM
RE: SFG/LAA - by raysman1 - 11-08-2010, 04:51 PM
RE: SFG/LAA - by Jordan - 11-08-2010, 06:30 PM
RE: SFG/LAA - by AndyP - 11-08-2010, 05:40 PM
RE: SFG/LAA - by Scott - 11-08-2010, 11:24 PM
RE: SFG/LAA - by hokeyrules - 11-09-2010, 12:05 AM

Forum Jump: