+- First Class Mogul (https://www.firstclassmogul.com)
+-- Forum: General Manager's Office (https://www.firstclassmogul.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=26)
+--- Forum: Trade Central (https://www.firstclassmogul.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=32)
+---- Forum: Trades In-File (https://www.firstclassmogul.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=35)
+---- Thread: LAD-TOR-TEX (/showthread.php?tid=9765)
LAD-TOR-TEX - AndyP - 11-27-2011
Texas outgoing:
All picks - Rounds 1-6 (15th in each round)
Texas Incoming:
Norberto Pladera 80/93 SP
Jamie Buckun 78/84 RP
Neville Pebbles 63/80 OF
Toronto Outgoing:
Jamie Buckun 78/84 RP
Neville Pebbles 63/80 OF
Toronto Incoming:
Texas 3rd and 4th picks
LAD Incoming:
Texas 1,2, 5, 6 picks
LAD Outgoing:
Norberto Pladera 80/93
Woofta.
Ok, so from LAD's perspective, Pladera isn't part of the future plus he isn't the style of pitcher I prefer. Instead we get four prospects, two of which are great value, high round prospects.
From Toronto, they give up a reliever I think is about to take a boost, but isn't in our immediate plans, so we get to reload with some younger guys.
RE: LAD-TOR-TEX - jjhels - 11-27-2011
(11-27-2011, 04:31 PM)AndyP Wrote: Texas outgoing:
All picks - Rounds 1-6 (15th in each round)
Texas Incoming:
Norberto Pladera 80/93 SP
Jamie Buckun 78/84 RP
Neville Pebbles 63/80 OF
Toronto Outgoing:
Jamie Buckun 78/84 RP
Neville Pebbles 63/80 OF
Toronto Incoming:
Texas 3rd and 4th picks
LAD Incoming:
Texas 1,2, 5, 6 picks
LAD Outgoing:
Norberto Pladera 80/93
Woofta.
Ok, so from LAD's perspective, Pladera isn't part of the future plus he isn't the style of pitcher I prefer. Instead we get four prospects, two of which are great value, high round prospects.
From Toronto, they give up a reliever I think is about to take a boost, but isn't in our immediate plans, so we get to reload with some younger guys.
Confirm. Get a young, front-line pitcher with more upside, plus a stud reliever who could even close soon. Pebbles a project, but could develop into a DH.
Not overly impressed with this draft, so this gives us at least two proven pieces.
RE: LAD-TOR-TEX - AndyP - 11-27-2011
For the record, I am running both the Dodgers and Jays, so if there is any issue with this based on that fact, please bring it forward - I have no issue with dissolving this if there is a perceived conflict of interest.
RE: LAD-TOR-TEX - jps93 - 11-27-2011
eh i really don't care. looks like its in the best interest of both teams.
approve
RE: LAD-TOR-TEX - mattynokes - 11-27-2011
This is a mess to read. Instead of outgoing and incoming, it'd be better if it was just listed what teams received what with the trading team in parentheses.
Team 1 Gets:
Player A (Team 2)
All Picks (Team 3)
Team 2 Gets:
All Picks (Team 1)
But, approve
Team 3 Gets:
Player B (Team 1)
Player C (Team 2)
RE: LAD-TOR-TEX - AndyP - 11-27-2011
Sorry...I toyed with a couple ways of doing it, but it never seems to fix the confusion - sorry!
RE: LAD-TOR-TEX - Atlbravesfan27 - 11-27-2011
approve
RE: LAD-TOR-TEX - hokeyrules - 11-27-2011
approve
RE: LAD-TOR-TEX - dejota - 11-27-2011
done