+- First Class Mogul (https://www.firstclassmogul.com)
+-- Forum: General Manager's Office (https://www.firstclassmogul.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=26)
+--- Forum: Trade Central (https://www.firstclassmogul.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=32)
+---- Forum: Trades In-File (https://www.firstclassmogul.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=35)
+---- Thread: PIT/LAA (/showthread.php?tid=2699)
Pages:
1
2
RE: PIT/LAA - AndyP - 11-12-2010
I am willing to maintain my approval, but only if this deal does not result in the Panda deal. If seperate, I think this can be approved.
But LAA - very schizo trading right now.
RE: PIT/LAA - Scott - 11-12-2010
DONE
RE: PIT/LAA - Scott - 11-12-2010
I APPROVED THIS FOR IT TO GO THRU!
RE: PIT/LAA - 'PR' - 11-13-2010
(11-12-2010, 10:57 PM)Scott Wrote: I APPROVED THIS FOR IT TO GO THRU!
You shouldn't have, because when it was closed you needed Raysman's approval once again in order for it to be valid. Why has that been demonstrated in many other trades and left out here? Especially with the fact that we are watching new GMs ever so closely. :)
PS.....It was closed, and for about half a day to 24 hours too. Jordan had it reopened. I saw it close and I saw Jordan reply after it was closed, which would suggest he reopened it.
RE: PIT/LAA - Scott - 11-13-2010
I most certainly do not need his re-acceptance. He accepted in the beginning, the trade did NOT change, therefore his acceptance is still applicable.
This is the end of this.